Modern distributed systems increasingly rely on event-driven and stream-based architectures. Instead of batch-oriented ETL pipelines, applications now ingest, process, and react to data in motion. Cloud providers offer managed streaming platforms that abstract infrastructure complexity while delivering low-latency, fault-tolerant data pipelines.

This article provides a technical overview of real-time data streaming options on the cloud, focusing on architecture, guarantees, scalability, and trade-offs.

Core Concepts in Real-Time Streaming

Before comparing services, it's important to understand the underlying primitives:

  • Producers – Applications emitting events or records
  • Brokers – Durable, distributed systems that store and route events
  • Consumers – Applications processing streams
  • Partitions / Shards – Units of parallelism and ordering
  • Offsets / Checkpoints – Track consumption progress
  • Delivery semantics – At-most-once, at-least-once, exactly-once

Most cloud streaming services are built around these abstractions.

1. Apache Kafka (Managed Cloud Deployments) Architecture Overview

Kafka is a distributed commit log. Data is written sequentially to partitions and replicated across brokers.

Key components:

  • Topics → Partitioned logs
  • Brokers → Store and replicate data
  • ZooKeeper / KRaft → Metadata and cluster coordination
  • Consumer groups → Parallel stream processing
Cloud Implementations
  • Amazon MSK
  • Confluent Cloud
  • Azure Event Hubs (Kafka protocol)
Guarantees & Performance
  • Ordering guaranteed within a partition
  • At-least-once by default
  • Exactly-once supported via transactions and idempotent producers
  • Extremely high throughput (millions of events/sec)
Trade-offs
  • Operational complexity (even when managed)
  • Requires careful partition planning
  • Higher cost at scale
Best For
  • Event sourcing
  • Microservice communication
  • Log-based architectures
  • Streaming backbones

2. Amazon Kinesis Data Streams Architecture Overview

Kinesis uses shards as the fundamental scaling unit. Each shard supports a fixed read/write throughput.

Components:

  • Producers → PutRecords API
  • Shards → Ordered sequence of records
  • Consumers → Enhanced fan-out or polling
  • Checkpoints → Stored externally (e.g., DynamoDB)
Guarantees & Performance
  • Ordering per shard
  • At-least-once delivery
  • Sub-second latency
  • Serverless scaling (with manual shard control or on-demand mode)
Trade-offs
  • AWS-only
  • Shard-based scaling can require tuning
  • Less flexible ecosystem than Kafka
Best For
  • Native AWS architectures
  • Clickstream analytics
  • Log ingestion pipelines

3. Google Cloud Pub/Sub Architecture Overview

Pub/Sub is a globally distributed messaging system with push and pull subscription models.

Components:

  • Topics → Message streams
  • Subscriptions → Message delivery config
  • Ack deadlines → Control redelivery
  • Dead-letter topics → Failure handling
Guarantees & Performance
  • At-least-once delivery
  • Ordering supported with ordering keys
  • Horizontal auto-scaling
  • Extremely low operational overhead
Trade-offs
  • Limited long-term message retention
  • Less control over partitioning
  • Not ideal for replay-heavy workloads
Best For
  • Event-driven microservices
  • Serverless pipelines
  • Cross-region event distribution

4. Azure Event Hubs + Azure Stream Analytics Architecture Overview

Azure Event Hubs is similar to Kafka/Kinesis, using partitions for scale and ordering.

Components:

  • Event producers (AMQP, HTTPS, Kafka API)
  • Partitions → Ordered streams
  • Consumer groups → Parallel consumption
  • Capture → Automatic storage in Blob/Data Lake
Guarantees & Performance
  • At-least-once delivery
  • Kafka-compatible endpoint
  • Low-latency ingestion at high throughput
Trade-offs
  • Azure ecosystem dependency
  • Less flexible stream processing without additional services
Best For
  • Telemetry ingestion
  • Azure-native analytics
  • Kafka migration to Azure

5. Stream Processing Engines (Flink & Spark Streaming)

Streaming platforms handle transport, but real-time value comes from processing.

Apache Flink
  • True event-time processing
  • Stateful stream operators
  • Exactly-once semantics via checkpoints
  • Low-latency windowing
Apache Spark Structured Streaming
  • Micro-batch-based processing
  • Unified batch + streaming APIs
  • Easier learning curve
  • Higher latency compared to Flink
Cloud Availability
  • Databricks
  • Amazon EMR
  • Google Dataproc
  • Azure HDInsight
Best For
  • Fraud detection
  • Sessionization
  • Real-time aggregations
  • ML feature pipelines

Architectural Patterns
1. Event-Driven Microservices

Services communicate via events instead of synchronous APIs.

2. Lambda / Kappa Architectures
  • Lambda: Batch + stream processing
  • Kappa: Stream-only processing using log replay

3. Change Data Capture (CDC)

Databases emit change events using tools like Debezium into Kafka or cloud streams.

Choosing the Right Tool: A Technical Comparison
RequirementBest Fit
High throughput & replayKafka
Serverless simplicityPub/Sub
AWS-native streamingKinesis
Azure ecosystemEvent Hubs
Stateful stream processingFlink
Unified analyticsSpark Streaming
Final Thoughts

Real-time data streaming on the cloud is less about choosing a single service and more about designing a resilient, scalable data pipeline. Transport layers (Kafka, Kinesis, Pub/Sub) and processing layers (Flink, Spark) must work together to deliver correctness, performance, and reliability.

For developers, understanding partitioning strategies, delivery guarantees, and state management is critical to building production-grade streaming systems.