ISPconfig allows clustering for HA
Instead everyone is going for cpanel's high prices
litespeed can be settled by getting the company to contribute to the open source project and support their own software for their own benefit
Instead everyone is going for cpanel's high prices
litespeed can be settled by getting the company to contribute to the open source project and support their own software for their own benefit
QFT.
I really have no clue what or who the OP is trying to sway here. I don't even know why HA is brought into the discussion.
HA for regular website just cause more problems and quite frankly people don't really care for it.
If you really need HA, then you have the money and the resources to not use shared hosting. LOL
The cpanel hate boat sailed away longggggg time away since their first price increase. Resulting some people migrating to DA.
To suggest selling for-profit service with an opensource software is a laughable idea.
I really have no clue what or who the OP is trying to sway here. I don't even know why HA is brought into the discussion.
HA for regular website just cause more problems and quite frankly people don't really care for it.
If you really need HA, then you have the money and the resources to not use shared hosting. LOL
The cpanel hate boat sailed away longggggg time away since their first price increase. Resulting some people migrating to DA.
To suggest selling for-profit service with an opensource software is a laughable idea.
I'm not sure that end users would have any clue what you're talking about.
"What control panel do you use?"
"The one my host has."
"When did you last log in to it, and why?"
"Last year, I needed to add an email account for my brother to use".
You're not going to conscript end users to persuade hosts to convert to your favourite control panel. You need to find a different way.
"What control panel do you use?"
"The one my host has."
"When did you last log in to it, and why?"
"Last year, I needed to add an email account for my brother to use".
You're not going to conscript end users to persuade hosts to convert to your favourite control panel. You need to find a different way.
Cpanel’s been the “default” for so long that hosts and end-users just stick with what they know, even if it’s pricey. ISPConfig’s clustering is a huge selling point, but it does take more tinkering and know-how to get set up right.
It’s kind of like people paying extra for a familiar brand instead of trying something that might actually suit them better.
Do you think if ISPConfig put more focus on polishing the UX and onboarding, more people would give it a shot?
it would definitely be a boost and attract people who are used to overpriced wp engine with low performance
having high na with high frequency cpus is certainly welcome
There are a myriad of ways to go about it.
it's either done on the filesystem&database level or the underlying vm level
what are the "myriad" ways you're referring to?
As for SysAdmins, I'm sure I'm not the only one who remember a new release of ISPconfig that had major problems, and was further compromised by the previous version's download having already been deleted from the ISPconfig site, and the ISPconfig support folks saying that it was impossible to bring it back thanks to the software they used.
My apologies to ISPconfig. My aging memory failed me. It was Duplicity (backup software) where this problem occurred.
Cpanel’s been the “default” for so long that hosts and end-users just stick with what they know, even if it’s pricey. ISPConfig’s clustering is a huge selling point, but it does take more tinkering and know-how to get set up right.
It’s kind of like people paying extra for a familiar brand instead of trying something that might actually suit them better.
Do you think if ISPConfig put more focus on polishing the UX and onboarding, more people would give it a shot?
It’s kind of like people paying extra for a familiar brand instead of trying something that might actually suit them better.
Do you think if ISPConfig put more focus on polishing the UX and onboarding, more people would give it a shot?
does it use a 3 node solution from proxmox or similar? LOL
There are a myriad of ways to go about it.
Highly Available cPanel based services are possible. There are providers that offer it.
Just because it’s not built into the panel doesn’t mean it’s not doable.
does it use a 3 node solution from proxmox or similar? LOL
Highly Available cPanel based services are possible. There are providers that offer it.
Just because it’s not built into the panel doesn’t mean it’s not doable.
Just because it’s not built into the panel doesn’t mean it’s not doable.
ispconfig is opensource, if you want to download the previous version, just go to their git and select the version you want, unless it's an obsolete unsupported version, which is a concern
I'm not sure that end users would prefer a "better UI" over having 99.999% uptime HA
it only makes sense if ispconfig is offered without HA versus cpanel,
it's not about the price, cpanel despite drawing in so much revenue, does not support ha clustering, so much for an expensive paid product
I'm not sure that end users would prefer a "better UI" over having 99.999% uptime HA
it only makes sense if ispconfig is offered without HA versus cpanel,
it's not about the price, cpanel despite drawing in so much revenue, does not support ha clustering, so much for an expensive paid product
- Page :
- 1
- 2
There are no replies made for this post yet.